The International Tinnitus Journal

The International Tinnitus Journal

Official Journal of the Neurootological and Equilibriometric Society
Official Journal of the Brazil Federal District Otorhinolaryngologist Society

Reach Us Reach Us Whatsapp +44 7367 141882

ISSN: 0946-5448

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Scale and its relationship with Pupillometry in chronic pain patients.

Author(s):

Wim E Tuinebreijer, Henk M. Koning*


Background: Functional disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) are associated with chronic pain syndromes. The COMPASS 31 score is a validated measure of the severity of autonomic impairment. Pupillometry is a rapid, non-invasive, and valuable indicator of autonomic nervous system function. Objectives: The present study aimed to develop and evaluate the reliability of the Dutch version of the COMPASS-31 and to determine whether pupillometry is related to the autonomic scores of the COMPASS-31. Methods: A retrospective study of all chronic pain patients who had Pupillometry and completed the COMPASS-31 score in Pain Clinic De Bilt in the period from January 2025 to May 2025 (n=62). We explored the reliability of the COMPASS-31 test by determining Cronbach‘s alpha and Intra-Class Correlation Coefficients (ICC agreement). We also calculated the Spearman correlation coefficients among the six domains of the COMPASS-31 and pupillometry observations and among the items of the COMPASS-31 and pupillometry values. Results: This study examined 62 pain patients using the patient-reported outcome measure COMPASS-31 after it was translated into Dutch and utilized a pupillometer. We calculated the correlations between the COMPASS-31 items and the pupillometry values. These correlations reveal a clear relationship between pupillometry and the COMPASS-31 items that assess autonomic symptoms related to the light perception reaction of the eyes, as well as the response after standing up and experiencing a dry mouth. Conclusion: The COMPASS-31 is a moderately reliable patient-reported outcome questionnaire looking at multidimensional autonomic domains. The significant relationship between the COMPASS-31 and pupillometry demonstrates construct validity. Objective measurements, such as pupillometry, are not superior to subjective measurements like the patient-reported outcome COMPASS-31.

PDF